Sunday, February 28, 2016

Language


Should words have just one meaning or more than one meaning?

I think that words should not have just one meaning. Part of the beauty of language is that words can be interpreted in different ways. For example in Latin, there are multiple ways to interpret a single line of poetry. While it may create some confusion for those who listen to/read it, the multiple meanings of words can make language apply to a large range of areas. A language with many meanings for a single word reflects the differing experiences that people have regarding that word. The counter-argument would be that it would be much more efficient to have one meaning for each word to avoid confusion. However I would argue that language would be very outdated as well as lifeless and stagnant if each word had a single meaning. Language is dynamic; meanings for words change as different connotations for them arise. I would also argue that the main purpose of language is to communicate and express feelings or emotions. Forcing a single meaning to each word would make it much harder for people to show their exact feelings or to communicate what they wanted to. Language creates a way to convey a personal style by using different words with different connotations. A good comparison would be how poetry can articulate some emotions and feelings that regular prose cannot. Reducing language to a single meaning for each word would eliminate a crucial aspect of language: individual expression.

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Justified True Belief


Are there reasons to be skeptical of your knowledge claims?

I think that it is good to be skeptical of your own knowledge claims. Skepticism maintains an open-mind, which paves the way to possibly uncovering a deeper truth. I read an article several months ago in which it detailed how the human mind was originally wired to believe what it heard. The mind was meant to believe what it wanted to believe and what it already believed. However the human mind began to change to be skeptical and question common claims. Skepticism is beneficial but only to the right degree. For example, someone who is too skeptical would be stuck in a bubble, unable to believe or trust anything. Conversely, someone who is not skeptical at all would be used by other people because they were too gullible. A moderate level of skepticism would be someone who has an open mind, but questions certain things. If no one was skeptical, everyone would believe what they were told and people would accept possible discrepancies in common knowledge.

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

The Allegory of the Cave


Questions:

  1. In the story, the man has to adjust to the new light that he sees, since he is so used to being in the dark. Do you think that people would not want to adjust to the light and not even leave the cave, even if they had the chance?
  2. Do you think it would be possible to persuade the people still in the cave to come out or will they always want to remain in the cave?
  3. How does society shape the way we perceive light and darkness?